DNA/Immortality

In March 2011, I had someone "young" write me on You Tube. After responding no, a short explanation why, and sharing my video about transfiguration, to the first request, I got another email with this in it:

"That's not true, even Louise Hay knew people could be immortal, before the researchers found out that we indeed have that DNA abillity. Thought you were an angel and angels don't have judgements about people, even asking such questions, which in case would save my - and others lives. I thought you can go and ask an angel for me but that's okay, another 'spiritualist' out there...I don't blame you, there are many that think the same."

I had no idea where the "immortality" came from, as it wasn't mentioned in the first email but, with the help of guidance, I gave this response: 

Immortal is not what you asked. You asked: "can you help me to transfigure my face, I mean to change the way I look, change my DNA on a spiritual level?" As you even said, Louise Hay said we COULD be immortal (key word being could) but let's think about the obstacles, etc.

First, everyone is immortal - when it comes to our souls. You asked about changing your DNA. Your DNA is who you are - in this life - what you chose to be before coming here - along with the influences your soul will produce for you too. You mess with it (the flesh) - which is your choice - you might get more than you bargained for. Anyone that has been in an accident and lost a limb or been brain damaged knows what I mean. You will eventually leave this life, as this human being that you manifested, and then you can change it (spiritual level) by going into another incarnation - another life. No one will stop you on that.

Even so - changing anything (any point of view of collective reasoning) can take time (belief too) - I'm not saying it is not possible but you also have to remember - it is not your thoughts (beliefs) alone - we live in a world of very strong collective thoughts - go up against it some time and you'll see what I mean. When I say collective thought - think of things like science or religion. Very strong collective thought that can beat you down if you try to take their "glory" away from what they are maintaining.

To continue, I am a mortal as you are - we bleed/ we die - even though we are doing much to live longer. Maybe I should say, we cross over into the spirit realm - as we are still alive - we still remember. Immortals as angels (spirits or whatever you wish to call the etheric realm) do not - unless they are closed down in an incarnation - to me that is a form of dying - as you forget who you are. If anyone tells you they are immortal and a physical person - if they can bleed - they can die.

I do not have a judgment - didn't even express one - just telling you what I have learned in over twenty years of mind communication with some very evolved beings - not always of this world - who know of our world and what we are capable of - the same ones that taught me how to read the energy of thought and emotions off of anyone that has a soul. The same things I teach others - with validity and support from them - so I know it's true.

People will only believe what they want to believe or hear. We are taught what we are ready to hear or know. In this moment in time - due to the hate and violence on this planet - we are not allowed to do more due to collective thought of those who promote negativity. Look around - I'm sure you will see all the vices on this planet. Now - add in all the medical professions - the ones we count on for survival or burial - those that have to provide for their necessities - they have prayers too. Guess who answers those prayers? We - the mortals on this planet. So to be an immortal here on this planet means to go against a lot of people (collective thought) that need us to not be immortal for their survival. You see - it's a Catch-22. Damned if you do - dammed if you don't.

Now you mentioned me being able to save people's lives as an angel. Well, that's what my videos are for - to teach you and others how to take better care of yourselves. To learn how to know the truth and not be swayed by those that wish to control with false ideology that only cause pain and hurt when you are defeated by them - that same pain and hurt that causes illness and death. To control even your thoughts - those same thoughts of yours that you will want to manifest immortality in the physical. But I will not do it for you as any parent will do for their child - they teach them to be empowered.

Good luck on your journey - and more power to you - seriously. Hugs and peace...

After I replied, I decided to share this to some of my social-media, metaphysical friends in a note. We had a very agreeable and lengthy discussion about it. It's where I found it today and decided to also share it in my blog. 

Also, if interested, here's the video I shared: 

Shape Shifting or Transfiguration?

https://youtu.be/ZHZvTOVZYtk

Change: Be Careful What You Wish For.

Please bare with me, I know this may be long, but after reading some pros and cons about medicare for all/single payer/insurance health care, from articles and comments on social media, I've come to the conclusion that you can't please everyone, nothing is ever perfect, and ignorance abounds. 

But, in my opinion... and this is all my opinion... once we have MFA/SPH (if we do), we wouldn't have the choices we have today. Check and balance is also important. Something I learned in my accounting days. Which is why, good or bad, we have political parties. Choice. 

Even with education, we still have school choices (home, private or public). I pay towards public (primary/secondary) education through my real estate taxes, but that doesn't mean I think it's the best education and I shouldn't hold others back from getting a better one, if they choose. 

Anyway, as responsible adults, we are required to take care of our health by having health insurance. We're also required to have home and auto insurance, if applicable. Yet, I know some people don't think they should have that either. But, should the government (we the people) pay for that insurance too? Well, some people may think it's a great idea, but is it? 

You know that saying... be careful what you wish for? Change isn't always positive or progressive. Most people may not be thinking about the consequences of giving too much power to these government people in charge and, obviously, aren't mature enough to realize how they're trading off their freedom by having another make their choices. Isn't that why most children, eventually, leave home so their parents stop making decisions for them? 

So, when did we think it was okay to have the government decide for us... all the time? Do we really need "Big Brother" making all our adult decisions? Well, maybe some do need help. There are exceptions to the rule. But, we do have multiple programs for that too, in many areas, private and government, including medical. 

Besides having health insurance, I've also paid into Medicare my entire adult life. But, when it came to retiring, the government laid out my insurance plan and I had to pay more for additional things. However, I still didn't feel that was good enough and decided to get a supplement insurance which helped improve it. Instead of whining, I had the ability to choose a better option for my health. Thank God I had that choice and that I didn't have to count on Medicare only. 

As many know, the government doesn't always have the best reputation in getting things done much less paying their bills. Ask people in the medical field. They can attest to this. Some doctors won't take Medicare because of it. One comment from a person stated that the government works to lower the price they pay but even then they don't pay. It's not the first time I've heard or read that over the years. But I've never had a problem with my Medicare supplement insurance plan. At least, not yet. 

With insurance companies, if we don't like how they treat us, or what they provide, we can go to another. With a single payer plan, no choices. You get what you get. It might sound great in the beginning, but, over time, decline, in many areas, can and has occured, based on the input that I've read from people in other countries. 

In fact, back in the early nineties, on a trip to Germany, a tour guide was talking about their universal health care and said: "If you have money, you can jump ahead in the line." It still seems to be that way today with anything. Universal health care won't stop preferential treatment and I've seen that preferential treatment, in those countries, with the rich or government employees. Do you think it will be any different here? Doubt it. 

So, I see a very slippery slope. What next? Government run homeowners or car insurance... as someone thought was a great idea? Or, how about government run plumbing and electrical workers?  No competitive market? You get what you get? Will we still have a need for lawyers after awhile? Will a runaway government controlled country allow lawsuits? Against medical? Against government? 

Sometimes, the things that sound good aren't always. Hindsight and all. Yes, I agree that there's good and bad in everything. Wisdom is important in making decisions. And that's why intellectual discussion is vital for positive change. Some of the comments, that I read, weren't factual, intellectual, much less wise. More like adults acting like greedy and petulant children who were still tied to those proverbial apron strings. 

And, as I told an acquaintance, many years ago, we have a system that's pretty balanced in our country, if you think about it. It’s a combination of socialism and capitalism. We have to protect that so one side doesn't dominate the other. 

Is our healthcare perfect? No!

Is socialized healthcare perfect? No!

Will we always have what we want? No! 

Is life always fair? No! 

But it's not always the government that may take the sting out of life, it's also great family and friends. Shouldn't we keep a broader circle when it comes to our mental and physical health?

 

Right or Wrong. Lies or Truth. Evil or Good.

This quote got me thinking, because I've learned that our perception of right and wrong may change over time. And, I feel right and wrong depends on what side of the fence we're on. I know that we have a general consensus of that, only to create order out of chaos. 

And, as far as evil, yes there is that too. There are some who are very wicked. But, I wondered if we're on a perpetual cycle of reaping what we sowed? Is someone still holding a past or current life grudge? Did we do something evil to them? Are we paying for it now? We're all in this energy that we call the universe. What past rift, in the universe, did we create or ignore? Yin/Yang?

As far as truth, I understand that truth can be subjective, but I've always believed there is ultimate truth in each moment. Meaning, currently I'm a brunette, but I color my hair. That's a truth that should come off the universe with no shadow of doubt. It's what I call God's truth. It's what I seek when asking for guidance, along with my intellectual and emotional  experiences. It's what I use to guide myself and others. 

But like Plato's Allegory of the Cave, guiding someone into a different truth may mean removing their fear first. Without that, it may be difficult for them to see it, because fear, or mistrust, tends to hold people in their old way of thinking. Your truth may seem to be a lie to them. And, if the majority holds onto this lie, it may take more awareness, and more time, to change anything. 

Some may accept and some may decline. It is what it is.

Seeing Emotions?

Years ago, I was teaching a student about putting images to emotions. Sometimes, one psychic ability may be blocked and another one may need to be ramped up to get answers. I decided to share this in order to help others understand how you can work on unblocking any or all.

S: Is it possible to see an emotion?

T: You don't see emotions, you feel them. People feel emotions all the time and can put an image to them or not.

S: Well, that's sort of what I am asking. Can I see an image of an emotion... that can happen?

T: Yes, if you feel an emotion, it can give you the sense of what it is. It's like me mentioning a decorated birthday cake. If I don't describe it in detail, you can pick up my emotions about it and put images to it. Your mind may play tricks on you, so you have to, constantly, ask the universe for the truth in what you are receiving from those emotions. Verification is important, too. It may take time, when you're first learning, but it can be done. It's the same with sensing an image of a person. Be careful to ask for and feel the truth in it as I did when I was doing those soul beginning videos and "fine tuning" the looks of a being not from here, for instance. That's when interrogation goes into play. You have to become a detective and keep asking until all feelings of doubt are removed. Hope that makes sense and helps you.

S: Yes, perfect sense!

The Truth Will Set You Free?

I, finally, decided to meditate and ask for guidance over a question that's been bothering me for sometime.

Q: Why do some people say our President lies or is a liar, but can't look at their own party's lies and manipulation? I'm not saying he's perfect but is my intuition off about this?

A: No, it's not off. How would you feel if you were constantly fed lies and then someone comes along and tells the truth? Even half-truths, due to national security, can be disconcerting over any deception one has bought into. People feel they have to belong to something or someone. Sometimes, they have been disappointed, misled, or even abused by those they thought cared about them. It hurt them, but out of some misplaced loyalty, they feel the need to defend or protect those who have done them harm. Including calling out others for what is actually occurring within their home or group. They don't want to believe the person or group they're in isn't good for them... failed them. They become defensive and point fingers outside of themselves or their group. You see, as long as people have fear and hate, it can blind or block their intuition... God's guidance. There are those who want people to be in fear and hate because of it. But God's truth will never stay hidden. One day people wake up to it. Only then can they free themselves. Generally, that comes about when they realize they've been allowing the lies and lying to themselves... when they can look in their mirror and admit it... when they can finally walk away.

Q: Is this a lesson for them?

A: It's a lesson for us all.

I Have Rights!

Obviously, some people have no clue what a “right” is in a free country. You have the right to everything you can do and provide for yourself, without encroaching on someone else’s rights.

We have the right to freedom of speech. This does not give anyone the right to limit someone else's freedom of speech, because we may disagree with what they are saying or writing. We have a right to accuse someone of a wrong, but we cannot deny their right to self-defense. We have a right to religious freedom, but not a right to force any religion or belief system onto another. We have a right to vote but we're not forced to vote. We have a right to education, but are not required to use public education. People have a right to their identity, but they have no right to force their identity onto others. We have the right to seek healthcare, but we have no explicit right to receive it (or any other thing of value) from another person, regardless of the services provided. Another person's skill cannot be a right.

Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness are rights. Housing, legal representation, and healthcare cannot be a right because it requires another person to produce it. What happens when those who we've decided to burden with our right decide to stop providing their service and do something else? What if those who stay, to provide you with your right, are new or terrible at their jobs and you get poor treatment? Do you want a public defender, or do you want the right to pay for a decent defense lawyer, if you're charged with a serious crime?

We have a right to seek out the goods and services from trades. We have a right to reasonably regulate said goods and services, just as we have a right to refuse them. But, we don't have a right to force said trades to provide any services. Think not? Go to a plumber, electrician, or mechanic and demand they provide you service, because it's your right. What happened to their right of refusal? Even with public services, they too have rights... they're not slave labor. 

Yes, we even have a right to decline health insurance, but it's not anyone's right to force another to pay for it or their bill because they choose not to be responsible. I said choose, because there are those who feel they have a right to be irresponsible. Of course, this is not the same as any medical or mental hardship cases that our social services already cover. There are exceptions. Also, this isn't saying we don't have a right to refuse payment for bad services. No one should feel it's a right to steal from another. Which is why we have a right to seek legal counsel.

Medicare for all? I'm retired and now have Medicare. I've paid into it for many, many years, since I started working, but I still have to make monthly premiums. As it stands, it's not perfect. So far, I have a right to pay for a supplement in order to have better coverage. What right does anyone have to force me to give that up in order to belong to a single payer system? Just because some want to sign over their rights to a government healthcare, doesn’t mean others want to. Especially, one that has a proven track record of corruption and mismanagement of funds. 

Which is why our President insured that our veterans get faster healthcare by going outside the VA's sluggish system. Systems and structures produce outcomes, and those systems and structures are built through consent and perpetuated by incentives. Checks and balances are vital for positive outcomes. 

And some say, what about moral rights? Yes, what about it? What if some believe it's a moral right to euthanize all terminally ill humans as we do animals? What if a law is made because of it? What if others feel their rights are being usurped because of it? How far do we go using morals as a reason? Does any government have a right to constantly regulate something onto others due to morals?

Governments are not flawless. Stop giving your power away to them. Stop denying options to others just because you feel the need to control every situation for yourself or others. Do we really want - "it's my way or the highway"? Little to no options? Robbing Peter to pay Paul? What happens if we have a government shutdown on medical care because they can't afford to pay for services and supplies, or innovative technology, due to extreme government debt or wasteful spending? Where's my right for a backup system to prevent that? What right does anyone have to deny that? If people really believed the government was capable of handling all our issues, why do we have numerous foundations or charitable organizations, among other things, to assist humanity?

Lastly, and most importantly, we may want to keep in mind that we could be sacrificing rights by giving our power away to one entity or, as I mentioned above, to what another claims as a moral right.

The Bitter Truth

It's human nature (ego) for people to only see what they want to believe no matter what facts are presented. They don't want facts, they want their feelings placated. I know this because I learned it, bitterly, first hand. 

Many, many years ago, I was being, intuitively, told (sensing something was not right) that there was something bad going on in my life, but I didn't want to believe it. I kept pushing it out of my mind. Then facts presented itself and I still didn't want to believe it. Why? Because I was raised to believe in the good of people. And "good" people didn't deliberately hurt others. 

But "good and bad" depends on one's perspective - one's belief - one's cultural awareness. That, which I was ignoring, was a truth I didn't want to know. I wanted to reject it because I knew it would hurt me. As my dad used to say, sometimes the truth can hurt. It's what others have called the bitter truth. 

Since then, I've learned to follow my gut feelings. When I sense doubt, I, instinctively, back off in order to investigate my feelings. Is "someone" trying to tell me there's a new truth that needs to be understood? 

Because, I've learned - and have taught - that there is only one truth in the universe to follow and that's God's truth - God's wisdom. If you really want the truth, you'll get it. Even if you don't like it. And for anyone who considers themselves an atheist, use "ultimate truth" instead. The objective is seeking truth, even if we don't like the answer. 

In addition, I've also learned (and taught) not to be hasty in judging as truth can change. So, every minute of every day, we should never assume that things are the same. Just as the weather can change, so can human nature. And just because we don't like it, doesn't change the truth. And just because we want to placate our egos with "our truth" there's still God's (ultimate) truth to contend with. 

Like it or not. Hurtful or not. Bitter or not.

Disney and Rethinking Fat

I found this article (link below) about who decided it was bad to be fat. It had me thinking about the things I've learned, regarding people's weight, throughout history and in various cultures. I understand that many ideas change over time, due to more knowledge, but when I was younger, I remember so many people who were overweight and I never heard any negativity about it... until around my mid-teen years. Then I became more aware of the body shaming, jokes, or cautious health warnings, which became part of our Western culture. Before then, being a Navy brat, traveling to various places and seeing various sizes of people was just part of life.

In fact, I remember a lot of famous overweight people from my youth. For instance, Hoss from Bonanza, Jackie Gleason, Oliver Hardy, Raymond Burr, the opera singer Beverly Sills, or singers like Mama Cass and Kate Smith. Or, even cartoon characters like Fred Flintstone and Pete (Mickey Mouse), as well as historical people of royalty, like King Henry VIII or some of the Hawaiian Queens and Kings. And, of course, there are Peter Paul Ruben's famous paintings, which include his very "full-figured" women. I also had numerous family and friends, of various ages, who were overweight. I even remember talking about "starving actors" putting on some weight after they were on a television series for a few years... they were, obviously, eating better.  

As you can see, being overweight isn't a current culture phenomenon, as some Internet sites are indicating. Throughout history, various sizes of overweight people have existed everywhere and in every culture. Maybe we're noticing things more because there are more people on this planet and the Internet has made our world much smaller. But, even before the Internet, I started hearing about people being overweight, or underweight, as unhealthy. I've since learned that this isn't always the case. That's the thing about science, facts can change. An overweight person doesn't mean an unhealthy person. Besides, that's between them and their physicians.

Of course, I don't agree with certain cultures promoting obesity, but I understand they thought it was important. I read about people, around the world, who considered their women being fat was a sign of wealth. They fattened them up on purpose. There was no stigma either. Even in China, fat signified good fortune and wealth... hence the chubby and happy Buddha. 

Also, there was the Disney movie, Wall-E, that gave us a little warning on how the path of least resistance, and living the good life, can lead to being overweight. But, what was nice, even though it had a subliminal message of unhealthy living, I don't recall fat shaming. Of course, why would Disney do that anyway? They would understand that it's not just culture programing that's involved. Being overweight can also come about for many reasons. And, after all, besides Pete, they have created many, many fat characters. 

Hmmm... maybe all those various Disney characters was another subliminal message. If so, than thank you Disney for reminding us that humanity is not homogenized, regardless of culture, regardless of being rich or poor, and that we each have our attributes no matter what size or shape.

------

"Who Decided It Was Bad to Be Fat?" https://www.sapiens.org/column/curiosities/fat-acceptance/

Avenger Syndrome

I've been around long enough to know that many things can influence and possess our thinking. Most learn not to absorb extreme negative influences, but not everyone. There are some who don't have that mental filtering and those are the ones that can be easily manipulated. They can often be the immature or mentally ill, not just those on mind altering substances.

I started thinking about this after watching a movie that had graphic violence. It was about a man on a mission of revenge for an injustice that occurred to his family. That's when it struck me that there are movies being made that glorify the main movie character who feels he/she has been pushed too far and decides to fight back - even if murder and mayhem is involved. In our minds, these movies make people heroes/heroines. We applaud their decision. We even fight, emotionally, with their cause. We don't care about the other side, because, after all, they're the enemy. 

However, along comes real life people who may see a ton of these movies, may not have any moral beliefs of right and wrong, have no foundation of reality and believe they can live out any fantasy they want. They have no fears, lack empathy, and may feel they too have been pushed to the point where they need to get justice over a perceived wrong. They psych themselves into believing they could be a hero/heroine by fighting for their cause.

In their fight for justice, they may feel they will be vindicated in martyrdom. They decide to fight back. They create mayhem and murder. But, instead of being glorified, they are vilified. They are killed or imprisoned. You see, to an unbalanced mind, these types of movies, etc., may be what indoctrinates and desensitizes them. To them, they see that chaos needs order and they may see themselves as the righteous chosen... the avenger. What I term the Avenger Syndrome.

I feel that this is what we've been seeing, for many years, with some serial killers or mass murderers. Yes, we've had similar things occur throughout history, of people wanting retribution at all cost, without today's influences, but they still had something that influenced them - something that pushed them over the edge - something that made them feel they had to be an avenger. But now, it's as if, in their unbalanced mind, they've been handed a justifiable reason on a silver platter: "well, it was okay to do it in the movies."

Of course, this may be only one issue with those we deem mentally ill - perceived avengers who commit horrendous crimes - but how do we ever move beyond it? I know that finger pointing doesn't help, especially when we're all to blame to some degree. After all, what can we expect when a society constantly promotes us to be or do whatever we want, with some stretching that idea to infinity and beyond? Yes, some think that means anything - without repercussions.

I've also learned that denying other's rights, catering to a small few, isn't a positive path to take either. Which is why I believe this will continue unless we really start listening to their grievances and working with them, taking their fears seriously, and removing any harmful programming. For instance, "no you cannot be an avenger and murder people, there are serious consequences!"

Of course, extreme steps to take would be locking them away so they cannot harm themselves or others. History shows that didn't always bode well either, but desperate times may call for desperate measures.

What Ifs: Genealogy, History, Genetics, Inbreeding and Sexual Anomalies?

I've been reading a lot of various topics about genetic anomalies and decided to put some things together that I've been mulling over. However, I want to emphasize that the things I mention below are not limited to any particular class or race, it's just a few examples I'm using, based on research, that had me scratching my head and wondering what if. 

First, through my genealogy research, I started, inadvertently, learning about history and genetics. I discovered that past royalty inbreeding or limited spouse availability, in earlier times, caused various genetic anomalies... some were often fatal... and these genes can show up down the line. 

Then, after reading about Queen Christina of Sweden being considered an intersex (formerly known as hermaphrodite) person, along with some thinking that the first Queen Elizabeth may have had male pseudohermaphroditism, I started wondering, what if inbreeding may have contributed to intersex people? Why not? Anything's possible. Right? 

I first heard about inbreeding through a 1966 movie called Hawaii. It had early 1800 missionaries explaining that siblings marrying, having sex, and murdering their deformed babies was a sin. To the Hawaiians, it was all normal. But afterwards, I began to learn that, since ancient times and with many civilizations, it was considered quite normal for royal siblings to marry and have children, including disposing of any which may have been seriously deformed. 

I guess they didn't know how to put two and two together, back then. However, time has shown us that there is definitely good science behind the laws that prohibit siblings from having children. The risk for passing down a genetic disease is much higher than with first cousins. 

As I continued researching, I read something about a Native American acceptance of a certain anomaly and wondered why. Was it done for a deeper meaning? For instance, what if newly instilled religious morals protected deformed babies from being murdered and then special names were created, for the afflicted, as compensation... to justify their deformities... a gift from God, so to speak. 

For example, the East India girl with four arms and legs being called a goddess instead of a conjoined twin. Or, in the case of Diodorus Siculus (1st Century BCE) who described Hermaphroditus as having a physical body of a man and woman and who was able to foretell future events. Again, special names and talents... as a gift from God... or stories created due to genetic anomalies? 

The reason I started wondering about this was because I discovered, while researching transgenders, that there are various culture names, which are used for people having confused genders (like "two spirit"), that have been around for eons. I wondered if it was possible that they may have had some form of deformed genitals or genetic anomaly, in the past, but murder wasn't an option and corrective surgery wasn't either. So, names were created to make them feel special... instead of an outcast in their small villages, tribes or communities. 

Also, I read that some of these past royal's "noticeable deformities" may have been overemphasized. It seemed plausible to me. Isn't that how some myths begin? A little bit of fact mixed with a lot of creative writing. But, what if some anomalies weren't physically noticeable? With all that inbreeding, could some have had sexual abnormalities, like an intersex person? Possibly kept a secret for any number of reasons. It may explain why some couldn't have children, which may be a blessing in disguise... removing bad blood. 

Yet, what if some royal children weren't from inbreeding and were actually produced via secret affairs and surrogates, in order for someone who was intersex to appear normal to the public or to produce normal children? After all, we know eons of deceit and hanky-panky ran rampant with some royalty, too. Maybe this too could have been a blessing in disguise... new blood. 

Anyway, this is only some of my what ifs. Hopefully, you can see why I was having them. I felt it was interesting enough to share, because I'm one who seeks answers in order to remove fears and prejudices. I just think it's amazing the things one discovers, and the questions that are provoked, because of genealogy questions, which often lead to various paths of research, like history and genetics.