Soul Essence: Born to Hate?

The other day, my youngest daughter was distraught over her oldest daughter's school experience: teens being their often hateful teen selves. Someone mentioned that kids are taught hate, they're not born that way. I countered with, why couldn't they be born that way? If we've come to understand that a person can be born gay, why can't someone be born with a hate gene? For that matter, any number of genes that scientist are still studying under the name of junk or mystery DNA, which I wrote about some time ago.

Anyway, as most know, through my videos and blogs, I don't look at just the physical genetics, I also look at the soul genetics. I've studied this for years. What makes people different? What drives people? I've learned that it's not always one lifetime but could be many lifetimes of programming? People can be born with physical genetics but we often overlook their eternal soul genetics.

What causes people to be born any certain way? What can trigger any emotion within them?  Sure, we can be born into a family, and take on a physical look from parents or grandparents, but what gives us our character? For instance, look at large families and the characters of each individual within them. Are they all the same? They can be brought up a certain way, taught principles and beliefs, have similar outside influences, but they are still unique.

Yes, environmental situations and accidents can create physical and mental changes but did this take place - each and every time? Yes, parents can teach bad or hateful behavior, but did this occur - each and every time? I've seen children who act kinder than their parents, including scolding a parent for being hateful. Furthermore, and as an example, why does a large family produce only one gay child? One transgender child? One with any particular addiction issue? One sociopathic child? One hateful child? Or none of the above? Was it the upbringing? Society influences? Was it within the soul?

There are many things that can create hate, being born with an angry soul is one of them. I've met people who are perpetually angry, mean-spirited, sullen, hateful, or verbally caustic in their behavior. Was it one life that created it or did they bring it with them? If they brought it with them, are they perpetuating that emotion - the "hate begets hate" scenario?

Also, do we keep telling ourselves they were born that way and ignore it? If that's the case, why bother with anyone being born any certain way? But we do, because we see things that we deem as abhorrent and want to change it. We see things we choose not to respect or understand. Cruelty is one of them ... hate is another. 

And, as an afterthought, I feel animals are not immune. That's why my sister named one of my cats the demon cat from hell. I only had one cat out of many that was born this way. Nothing wrong with her. Never gave me or my aforementioned daughter trouble, she just hated everyone else.

Be Careful What You Wish For...

As the saying goes: be careful what you wish for. Its often followed by: you may get it but it may not be what you thought it would be.

It's the same with having our prayers answered. We have to be very impeccable with those too. Someone may be sent to answer our prayers but we may not see it at first. For you see, God has used and continues to use some of the most unlikely people to bring about change to humanity.

Understandably, their paths are often littered with pitfalls to prevent their success. They've been mocked or crucified for going against the status quo. Being "chosen" doesn't mean an easy path and it's, definitely, not for the weak in spirit.

NWO - Globalization

Wow! Hold onto to your hats. What a mind blowing message I received this morning! So, you think we're not being puppeted? This all started with me asking about the Bush family. I couldn't understand why they were going against their own party politics just because of Trump. After all, they all have skeletons in their closets too. We know all politicians do. Some just hide it better.

So, guidance put the puzzle together for me. They reminded me, this morning during meditation, about the elder Bush being slammed for his NWO beliefs. They said, and I paraphrase, remember when people were outraged over his beliefs (see video below) and despising him for wanting to sell out America? Of course, he was a Republican wanting a NWO and people hated him. So, they hate Republicans now? It's the Republican's fault? Well, let's put a Democrat in office. We can manipulate them too. We can use Clinton's nafarius past to keep him aligned to the plan. Good little minion. How convenient that his disgrace opened the door up for our next puppet, we have Bush Jr. in office. Let's keep it going, he knows the plan. Back to hating Republicans again? Fine, we'll put another Democrat in office, but let's make it more appealing by using a black man, using him for the NWO. His background is ripe for the picking, but we'll change the name to Globalization, so they think it's a different program coming from the Democrats. They're coming along just like the good minions they are. And since the younger Bush was defeated by an outsider, no problem, we have a back up plan to make sure we keep this going. We'll support this woman, who has already been introduced and ensnared by this idealogy, so we can still perpetuate our dream.

Honestly, folks, you can't make this crap up. It could be a dramatic movie for all its twists and turns. You see, it's not party politics - it's a goal - the puppet masters don't care who they use. Brexit upset their plans. Trump is upsetting their plans. Think about it.

Lastly, think about why we were vehemently against the NWO ideal, when it was the Republicans, but are being pulled into Globalization (the same thing) by the Democrats, as if it's okay. Only because it's YOUR party this time? Seriously? Good little minions.

George H.W. Bush NWO Speech: 

https://youtu.be/byxeOG_pZ1o 

Semantics: It's All Paper

Semantics: Fact checkers stating that it's false, concerning that the State Department didn't lose $6 billion, because, what actually occured, they had misplaced the paperwork to back it up.

So, lost paperwork or lost money? It's all paper. Six of one, half a dozen of another.

In the real world, if I had "lost" $6 billion, due to "missing" paperwork, I would have to find the paperwork or I would be in jail for embezzlement. In the real world, any individual or business would be denied tax write offs, if there wasn't proper paperwork.

Obviously, the government world works differently. In fact, couldn't the government also falsify paperwork and get away with that too? How would we know if they "produced," in any manner, paperwork, in order to cover their behinds? Do they have fact checkers? Can we believe everything we read and hear from our goverment?

Besides, their reputation for insane contract spending is a matter of record. Well, civilian records, because the government tends to, obviously, lose theirs. But, let's be good little boys and girls. Let's believe we're in good hands. Let's smoke that dope or drink that kool-aid. Let's be useful idiots. After all, what's a billion here or there anyway? It's only money. Our money! Our nearly $20 trillion national debt money!

Quote: "The $6 billion figure comes from a State Department inspector general report that found paperwork for various contracts had been mismanaged. The $6 billion was not missing or stolen — it had been doled out in a number of contracts — but the paperwork was missing." - Politifacts

Clinton and Trump: Archetypal Manifestation

I posted the below Carl Jung quote, on my metaphysical school site, and, suddenly, I was thinking about the characters of Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, along with the often mob mentality I've seen on social media. Jung said an archetype is a typical character of human nature and in groups we can subcumb to the lowest emotion within that collective conscious.

This made me think about the collective thoughts regarding Trump and Clinton. Especially, if we consider some of the names they are being associated with like crooked, liar, or narcissistic. Especially, when we think about ourselves in relationship to them. Are they a reflection of our society? Of us? If so why? They didn't come out of nowhere. We're not experiencing them for no reason. I feel that they are here to make us look at ourselves - our society - our world - good or bad. They are a phenomenon; a pure archetypal manifestation of a real part of our collective psyche. 

Are we to learn more about ourselves because of it? Can we make changes? Maybe so, if we owe up to it. If we don't, it will not go away. It will return to the collective unconscious in order to gather more force and will come back with a greater prominence. That's what lessons do: keep teaching us until we get it. Often with more difficulty.

---------Quote

A group experience takes place on a lower level of consciousness than the experience of an individual. This is due to the fact that, when many people gather together to share one common emotion, the total psyche emerging from the group is below the level of the individual psyche. If it is a very large group, the collective psyche will be more like the psyche of an animal, which is the reason why the ethical attitude of large organizations is always doubtful. The psychology of a large crowd inevitably sinks to the level of mob psychology. If, therefore, I have a so-called collective experience as a member of a group, it takes place on a lower level of consciousness than if I had the experience by myself alone. ~ C.G. Jung (The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious - Collected Works 9i)

Useful Idiots

"In political jargon, useful idiot is a term for people perceived as propagandists for a cause whose goals they are not fully aware of, and who are used cynically by the leaders of the cause." - Wikipedia

Recently, I saw a comment on Facebook, that used it, and decided to investigate further. In doing so, I discovered a website that I thought I'd share. Needless to say, after reading that website, I've discovered where I've been used, ocassionally, as a useful idiot. Live and learn. 

Here is an excerpt from it:

"The term “useful idiot” is thought to have been coined by communist mass murderer Vladimir Lenin. It describes naive communist sympathizers in the West (liberals). While Lenin and the Soviets held these stupid liberals in utter contempt, they also saw them as useful tools for dispensing propaganda.

You will often find useful idiots (aka libtards) lounging about in a Starbucks with friends, discussing the shortcomings of America over a frappuccino. Useful idiots are a mix of urban hipsters, brainwashed college kids, busy bodies, self righteous do-gooders, silver pony-tailed hippies, (now college professors), quirky wannabe-intellectuals, hysterical females, girly-men, and Michael Moore devotees.

Useful Idiot Libtards aren't necessarily bad people, and in many cases, are exceptionally warm and kind hearted. Many have high IQ's and hold advanced degrees. They can hold files full of factoids in their brains, but lack the capacity to weave them together to find a coherent pattern. Though they fancy themselves as "free thinkers", they are actually the most authority worshipping (politically correct) and servile creatures you will ever meet. When it comes to independent critical thought, they are astonishingly stupid .....and very dangerous! To paraphrase the late great Senator Joseph McCarthy, libtards are "the unwitting hand maidens of the Communists."

It is important to note that many "conservatives" are just as deluded as useful liberal idiots. They spend all of their energy attacking low level libtards, feminists, environmentalists etc, while refusing to confront the real power that pulls their strings. From lofty perches high above the cloud level, the untouchable Globalists laugh as the "right" and the "left" beat each other up.

The good news about useful idiots, is that when one of them finally figures out how he has been played, he often becomes fanatically anti-Communist / anti-Globalist. There is hope for them...or at least some of them."

In addition to the above excerpt, by going to the website, you will see several interesting comparisons, along with pictures. In addition to the two I listed below, you will read about immigration, feminism, socialized medicine, foreign policy plus much more. 

**GLOBAL WARMING**
The Globalist/Communist: "Through our well paid psuedo-scientists and wholly owned media, we must aggressively promote the false science of Global Warming. The fear that this generates will enable us to raise taxes on carbon, erode national sovereignty, stifle economic progress, and gain control over private property and industry. Global Warming is one of the greatest power grabbing scams we have ever concocted! During periods of colder weather, we shall use the term 'Climate Change'.

The Useful Liberal Idiot: "Man made Global Warming is a proven fact! The science is settled! Only uneducated, anti-science, right wing flat earthers continue to deny it. Scientists who deny Global Warming all work for Big Oil. We need to address this problem now or our children are going to suffer."

**SEXUALITY**
The Globalist/Communist: "We must promote sexual promiscuity as a means of destroying the traditional family unit via adultery and unwed motherhood. This will financially ruin millions of divorced men and force millions of unwed mothers and their children to be dependent upon our centralized government."

The Useful Liberal Idiot: "Sex is natural and fun. Everyone should do it. The old fashioned hangups over pre marital sex and monogamy were forced upon society by the Church as a way of controlling people."

Website: http://www.tomatobubble.com/communistsandliberals.html

Now, I, for one, see these opinions (comparisons) as a time to reflect, especially if it causes me to spit and sputter with any instant rejection. Why? Because, I've learned, I'm getting my programmed ego in the way, and it may not reflect any new evidence. I've taught myself to back away and look at it with questions. Am I being pulled into any firestorm of emotions, swept along by the tsunami of falsehoods being perpetuated as truth without tangible facts? Has there been new evidence presented? Did I misread or mishear something? Am I being duped by my own ignorance to current data. Instead of shutting down to information, shouldn't I be taking the time to allow my reasoning and common sense to think things through?

As I've often said: When in doubt, check it out. You see, I don't want to be a useful idiot, a tool, a cretin, a sheep, or any other phrase that says I'm following anything without careful analysis via observation and investigation. I don't want to be a member of a crowd with no voice of my own; repeating only what I've been told.

How about you? 

~~~~~~~~~~
Blog picture and description is from the website: "The stained glass window below was originally from the Beatrice Webb House, former Headquarters of Britain's Socialist Fabian  Society.  It depicts the leading members of the 1890's Fabian Society (Sydney Webb & George Bernard Shaw) remolding the world according to their desires. The inscription reads: "Remould it nearer to the heart's desire." Beneath the floor of their workshop, unsuspecting Useful Idiots worship their propaganda books. The gods of Socialism / Globalism above openly mock the unsuspecting Useful Idiots below!"
~~~~~~~~~~

Power Tactics

I've spent many years teaching people about thoughts in the universe and how they can be powered into our minds. Any thought can filter into our minds. The only way to prevent it is with our mental wall we build to protect ourselves. We learn to do this in order to reject thoughts that go against our education and beliefs or to keep from overly reacting to them. Lately, it seems that many aren't heeding this universal wisdom and are being subjected to by a nefarious, tactical mental warfare.

For instance, below is the actual list by Saul Alinsky regarding power tactics that he outlined in his 1971 book "Rules for Radicals" and not what some are promoting on the internet as his - with their political twist. Alinsky's list is devoted solely to tactics and does not specify any particular targets of those tactics.

I decided to share this list because it's much of what we're seeing going on in many countries. If this wasn't so horrendous, (in some of these places, including America), it would make me chuckle. Only because of this one thought I had while reading them: who's trying to out tactic who and why?

After all, if I understand these power tactics, you can bet others do too. So - who's really fooling who? Read below to see what I mean.

Power Tactics:

Always remember the first rule of power tactics: Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.

The second rule is: Never go outside the experience of your people. When an action is outside the experience of the people, the result is confusion, fear, and retreat.

The third rule is: Wherever possible go outside the experience of the enemy. Here you want to cause confusion, fear, and retreat.

The fourth rule is: Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules. You can kill them with this, for they can no more obey their own rules than the Christian church can live up to Christianity.

The fourth rule carries within it the fifth rule: Ridicule is man's most potent weapon. It is almost impossible to counterattack ridicule. Also it infuriates the opposition, who then react to your advantage.

The sixth rule is: A good tactic is one that your people enjoy. If your people are not having a ball doing it, there is something very wrong with the tactic.

The seventh rule: A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag. Man can sustain militant interest in any issue for only a limited time, after which it becomes a ritualistic commitment, like going to church on Sunday mornings.

The eighth rule: Keep the pressure on, with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.

The ninth rule: The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.

The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.

The eleventh rule is: If you push a negative hard and deep enough it will break through into its counterside; this is based on the principle that every positive has its negative.

The twelfth rule: The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative. You cannot risk being trapped by the enemy in his sudden agreement with your demand and saying "You're right — we don't know what to do about this issue. Now you tell us."

The thirteenth rule: Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.

Dream: Soul Stealing?

I had a strange dream this morning which was kind of dark and mysterious. I felt that I was an invisible observer. Looking down on what was occurring. There were some things going on before this particular part but that's vague now.

What I do remember was what occured just before my alarm clock woke me. It was a woman and man going after another woman. They killed her by decapitation. Shocking! Horrendous! But it was what followed that puzzled me. The man and woman started to walk away. I followed as if I was a spirit watching them and they didn't know I was there. I slowly moved forward until the man was behind me and the woman was in front of me. The man spoke but I didn't hear him. I only knew he said something because the woman turned to the man and said: it's funny hearing you talk with her voice (meaning the one they killed).

Now, I do understand about stealing souls due to ego, someone wanting another's soul for a past life glory seeking, or interchanging souls for numerous reasons. I've had my experiences besides making videos and writing books about mine and other's. Which is why that, and my shamanic training, has taught me that it doesn't change out the personality, the voice, much less the gender (as her comment may have indicated). If our current programming is changed, it's subtle, unless the mind is being greatly influenced, been injured, or under attack. I've also learned that the personality may want to change. They go along with the influences for numerous reasons; one reason is for attention. Then there are the innocent minds that don't have enough maturity to protect themselves.

Lots of things to consider when investigating things like this, which is why that ending part of the dream puzzled me. That is until I realized, later today (as more information started filtering in), that the dream wasn't just for my benefit but for others - two to be precise. The more I meditated on what was going on, I began to feel that my mind had been influenced by a recent crossing over of an older man that needed a greater understanding of this soul interchange, spirit possession, and the dark/demonic side of life. The other was a young man who was still physical but led a life of fantasy - not well grounded. Both had been connected with my energy and influencing each other while dreaming.

These influences (soul connections) can happen to anyone at anytime which is why we may suddenly start having vivid or strange dreams after a long period of time without them or start having strange waking thoughts, including suicidal (especially, if someone leaves their life in that manner an attaches to us). Yes, we can have our minds influenced in our waking state as well as dream state. It doesn't have to be just the spirit world either. It can be by others who are still living who may be dreaming or even awake. That's because we can astral project consciously while awake or unconsciously while dreaming. Whatever may be affecting the minds of those who are consciously or unconsciously connecting can influence us as well as vice versa. As the saying goes: we're all connected. 

As far as the decapitation part, along with the attitude of "stealing" someone's soul due to it, there are those who feel it gives them more power, but they often forget it can give them the bad and not only the good. Besides, to me, that just wreaks of someone watching too much Highlander; that you have to decapitate someone to take their power. No, not me, as I haven't thought about this movie in years and it wasn't done with a sword like in the movie. There wasn't any "quickening" in my dream either, which I feel is a tad too theatrical. I'm inclined to believe that "beheading" part may have been influenced by this younger man who seems to need more grounding. I hope he gets it.

I'm now humorously compelled to end this blog with the "immortal" words from Highlander: There can be only one!

Okay, back to reality. 😉

Human Suffering

Some time ago, I had a friend ask about human suffering and why we have these hateful attacks including psychic attacks. She suggested that we shouldn't return the hate, to anyone that causes us harm, in order to keep from causing more of it. She added, "some people are constant instruments of hurt and pain, how do we prevent them from hurting us all the time?"

My reply: To be aware, educated, and intuitive are all instruments to help us avoid most of this hate, hurt and pain. You would think humans would be empathic enough, from all the eons of suffering, to understand it without having to keep living it over and over again.

Hate, hurt and pain may still happen, but, hopefully, we will see the karma in it and rise above it faster - instead of brooding or resenting. We can also learn to be stronger and hopefully present a "bigger picture" to those that care enough to improve their lives.

Yes, when it comes to why things happen, I've learned that there is, generally, a bigger picture involved. I don't often understand the full meaning behind it or may never know. Many times, in my life, I've looked back over something that I felt was bad and realized something good was created over it. That proverbial hindsight.

What amazes me about people is their need to fight instead of talk and reconcile. I suppose that some programming goes too deep to resolve. It's like this planet is in a constant, hateful turmoil and we can only hope something good will occur, eventually. However as long as people have hate in their hearts, are trained to fight, then the need to release those emotions, in an animalistic way, may be forever with us.

That's why teachers come back to ask us to reconsider our programming of violence and show us ways of bettering our lives. They must be wore out by now. However, when I see the hate of people slamming someone of something they did 20 or 40 years ago, or slamming people of our history with hate, those lives that are no longer physical, I seriously doubt very few have gotten any message from any teacher. 

Also, we may not be the instrument to help someone. I've learned that if I'm not helping someone, I could be inadvertently hurting them. I've gotten smart enough to let them go and move on. This creates a need for them to look elsewhere for help and maybe be directed to the right person to do it. In doing this, we also release our own hurt.

In this case, it's a win-win situation but only if both parties understand. Normally, people don't want to understand and only want to hate in return. This hate creates the need to attack, including these psychic attacks, which perpetuates our human suffering - ad infinitum.

----------
Picture: Tragic mask on the façade of the Royal Dramatic Theatre in Stockholm (Holger Ellgaard -Wikimedia Commons)
----------

The Consequences of Our Rights

Many times, I've noticed people who are demanding their rights may not understand the definition, which is: "that which is morally correct, just, or honorable; a moral or legal entitlement to have or obtain something or to act in a certain way." If we are going to protest against another's rights, while demanding our own, at least be logical, because we could lose the argument. 

For instance, when we sign up to work for a company, or the military, they have rights too. They are morally, and often legally, allowed those rights. If we don't like them, don't work for them. If we find them unjust, we have the right to leave. When I worked for Disney, they had a dress code. Sometimes people grumbled about it. But Disney wasn't breaking any moral or legal code by demanding it, and we had the right to work elsewhere. 

Additionally, if people don't want to respect our flag, or stand for it, it's their right to do so. Just as our goverment has a right to demand military personnel obey the flag rules or pay the consequences. A sports player has the right to sit during our national anthem, but a company has the right to take away their endorsements, because they feel they didn't uphold their moral, honorable, or legal end of a contract.

On a personal level, it's no different then when our children, acting out on their perceived rights, generally discover, sometimes the hard way, they weren't going to supersede their parent's rights.  

Also, "free speech" doesn't mean it's often moral, honorable, or legal either. That's the problem with our world today. Many don't speak to others, or treat others, with the same respect that they wish for themselves. Most act out of impulse without considering the repercussions.

So, it's okay for people to demand their rights but in doing so we have to understand there are consequences. 

Are we willing to pay them?